Test supplier payment timing, inventory levels and customer collection choices against a minimum-cash constraint.
See which operating choices improve cash, what they cost, and where the limits are before you change policy. Built for spreadsheet-based businesses. You receive an editable Excel decision model built around your real supplier terms, margins, demand and operating limits.
Goal: improve cash conversion while protecting margin, demand and operating feasibility.
Pay suppliers too early and cash leaves before it has to. Carry too much inventory and cash sits on shelves. Collect too slowly and sales become financing for customers. But pushing any lever too hard can damage supplier relationships, service levels, demand, or margin.
Test early payment, standard terms, extensions and payment scheduling. Quantify cash impact and any discount or cost trade-off.
Test reorder levels, safety stock, purchasing cadence and inventory reductions against demand and operating limits.
Test collection timing, customer terms and realistic DSO improvements while preserving commercial assumptions you define.
No generic benchmark pretending to know your business. The model starts from the terms and limits you actually operate under.
Payment dates, early-payment discounts, standard terms, minimum order rules and any supplier-specific constraints.
Gross margins, expected unit or revenue demand, seasonality and any assumptions needed to protect commercial economics.
Lead times, reorder points, safety stock, minimum purchase quantities, storage or capacity constraints.
Minimum cash balance, service-level requirements, collection limits, payment restrictions and other non-negotiables.
Current payment, inventory and collection assumptions translated into cash timing and working-capital requirements.
Change terms, inventory assumptions, demand and collection timing to see the cash and operating effect immediately.
Identify combinations that improve cash while respecting the minimum cash floor and operating constraints you approve.
A concise view of the selected payment, inventory and collection moves, expected cash release, trade-offs and binding limits.
Load supplier terms, margins, demand, current inventory logic, collection timing and cash requirements.
Agree which payment dates, inventory levels and collection assumptions are decision variables, and their allowed ranges.
Apply minimum cash, demand, margin, service, lead-time, supplier and other operating constraints.
Compare feasible scenarios and select the working-capital plan that best fits the decision objective.
No. We can work from the best available operating data, but the model will make assumptions visible so you can see where uncertainty matters.
Yes, if the scope and data support it. Payment timing, inventory and collections can be tested together because the cash constraint links them.
No. A pure minimum-working-capital answer can be operationally stupid. The model respects the margin, demand, supplier, service and operating constraints defined for the project.
Yes. The Excel deliverable is editable so you can update assumptions and rerun scenarios as conditions change.
Price depends on the number of decision variables, entities, products or supplier groups, the quality of the source data and the complexity of the constraints. Scope, price and timeline are confirmed in writing before work begins.
Send your supplier terms, margins, demand assumptions and operating limits. We will confirm the scope before any work begins.
No payment to submit the request. Scope, price and timeline are confirmed in writing first.